doe.sd.gov
>
Media Releases
Accreditation
and Certification
Certification
Alternative Certification
Certification Process
Non-Certified Administrators
Paraprofessional Certification
Praxis II Test
Principal Certification Option
Requirements for Human Relations / Indian Studies
Special Education Endorsement
Highly Qualified and Distinguished Educators
Highly Qualified Teachers
Distinguished Educators
Milken Educator Awards
National Board Certified Teachers
SD Teacher of the Year
Teacher to Teacher Support Network
Home School
K-12 Accreditation
Professional Practices
References
Civil Rights
Student Due Process
Teacher Preparation Programs
NCATE Partnership Agreement
Teacher Education Programs
Waivers
Administrative Rule Waivers
Current Waiver Holders
Assessment
and Accountability
Accountability
Assessment
ACT
SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium
Common Core Assessment
Dakota STEP
Dakota STEP - A
e-Metric
End of Course Exams
End of Course Exams - District Created
National Assessment of Educational Progress
NCSC Alt Assessment
South Dakota Assessment Portal
South Dakota Benchmark Assessment (SDBA)
Stanford 10 (Home School)
Testing Coordinators Workshops
WIDA/ELP Testing
WriteToLearn
Technology
NCLB Title II Part D
State Technology Plans
Curriculum
and CTE
Administrators
and Teachers
CTE for Core Content
CTE Teacher Certification
Perkins Act
Perkins Data Collection System
Conference
SD EPSCoR Funds
SD Project Lead The Way
Capstone Experience
Career & Technical Student Organizations
Career Cluster/ Programs of Study
Agriculture, Food & Natural Resources
Architecture & Construction
Arts, Audio/Video Technology & Communications
Business Management & Administration
Education & Training
Finance
Government & Public Administration
Health Science
Hospitality & Tourism
Human Services
Information Technology
Law, Public Safety & Security
Manufacturing
Marketing
Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics
Transportation, Distribution
& Logistics
Career Development
Cluster Camps
K-12 Service Learning
SD MyLife.com
Teachers as Advisors
Common Core Standards
High School 2025
High School Graduation Requirements
Standards and Curriculum
Advanced Placement
Common Course Numbering
Curriculum & Content Standards
Lexile Framework for Reading
Read! SD
Reading First
Reading Up
SD Counts
Postsecondary
Finance, Grants
Data Management
E-Rate and District Technology Plans
Data Request Process
Grants Management
Consolidated Grant Application
Financial Reporting Forms
Grant Allocations
Maintenance of Effort
Monthly Federal Grant Payments
Qualified Zone Academy Bonds
School Finance
School Finance Data
Extraordinary Cost Funds
Other Revenues
School Budgets
School District Audit Status
School/Student Data
Fall Enrollment
FERPA
Personnel Record Forms
Race and Ethnicity Reporting
Safe/Drug Free School Reporting System
Statewide Longitudinal Data System
Statistical Digest
Student Information Management System
Student Membership Reports
Verification of Educational Directory
Verification of Educational Structure
School Districts
Open Enrollment
Reorganizations
School District Maps
School Directory
State Finance
Contracts
DOE Budget
Vendor Information
State Aid
Health, Nutrition
After School
21st Century Community Learning Centers
Grantees
Resources
Professional Development
Child and Adult Nutrition Services
Child and Adult Care
Food Program
Child Nutrition Reauthorization
Commodity Supplemental Food Program
Food Distribution
Program
Fresh Fruit and
Vegetable Program
National School Lunch/ School Breakfast Programs
Special Milk Program
Summer Food Service Program and Seamless Summer
Team Nutrition
The Emergency Food Assistance Program
Coordinated School Health
Coordinated School Health Approach
Policy
Health Education
Physical Education
HIV/STD Prevention Education
Professional Development
SD Walk-n-Roll to School
Healthy Schools Project
School Health Profiles
Youth Risk Behavior Report
Title Programs
SPED, Head Start
Birth to 3
Federal Reporting
Parents Information
Service Coordinator/ Provider Information
State Interagency Coordinating Council
Head Start Collaboration Office
Special Education
Accountability Process
Advisory Panel
Complaints, Mediations and Due Process
Comprehensive Plans
Coordinated Early Intervention Services
Early Intervention (section 619)
Family Education
Rights & Privacy Act
Individual Education Program
IDEA Flowtrhough Funds
Parental Rights
Positive Behavioral Intervention Support
Response to Intervention
Section 504
State Performance Plan
Transition
Title Programs
Choice/ Supplemental Educational Services
Committee of Practitioners
Consolidated Title Reviews
Federal Monitoring
Flexibility Waiver Implementation
Title I Part A - Basic Programs
Title I Part C - Migrant Programs
Title I Part D - At Risk Youth
Title II Part D - Technology
Title III - English Language Acquisition
Title X Part C - McKinney-Vento Homeless Children and Youth Education
QUICK LINKS
2013 Legislature
A-Z Index
About the Department
Board of Education
Common Core
Content Standards
Indian Education
Report Card
School Directory
Statistical Digest
Stimulus
PRESS ROOM
News Releases
Publications
CONTACT
INFORMATION
Contact Us
RESOURCES
K-12 Data Center
SD Codified Laws
State Library
Teacher 411
Virtual School
BACK TO HOME
Searching for presenters for the 2013 Summit, Sept. 29-Oct. 1 in Chamberlain
Latest Media Releases
For Immediate Release:
Oct. 19, 2005
Contact:
Mary Stadick Smith - (605) 773-7228
NAEP results show South Dakota above national average
Results of the National Assessment of Educational Progress were recently released, and South Dakota students consistently achieved scores that were among the top 10 highest scores in the country.
“The NAEP offers a national picture of how our students compare with students across the country,” said Gov. Mike Rounds, “and, once again, South Dakota students outperformed their peers. We were especially pleased to see improvement in our Native American students’ scores.”
Commonly referred to as the “Nation’s Report Card,” the NAEP tests a random sample of fourth- and eighth-grade students in reading and mathematics. The test is given every two years in all 50 states and the District of Columbia and Department of Defense schools.
Math scores improve
In the area of math, South Dakota’s scores improved over 2003, the first time the NAEP was given in South Dakota.
With an average scaled score of 242, the state’s fourth-grade students had the fifth highest math score in the nation, sharing that honor with five other states. South Dakota’s score was up from 237 in 2003. The scores of South Dakota’s Native American students – the state’s largest minority group – also improved from 217 in 2003 to 221 in 2005.
With an average scaled score of 287, the state’s eighth-grade students had the third highest math score in the nation, a distinction shared by two other states. The score was up from 285 in 2003. Nationally, the eighth-grade average was 278. The math scores of the state’s Native American eighth-graders rose from 255 in 2003 to 260 in 2005.
Reading scores stayed level
Reading scores for South Dakota students remained steady or decreased slightly, which follows the national trend.
In grade four, South Dakota’s average reading scaled score was 222, the same score attained in 2003. This was the 7th highest score nationally. The national average was 217, up from 216 in 2003. The average score for South Dakota’s Native American students rose four points, from 197 in 2003 to 201 in 2005.
At an average scaled score of 269, South Dakota’s eighth-grade students had the fourth highest reading score in the nation, a place shared with three other states. The national average was 260 in 2005, down from 261 in 2003. South Dakota’s Native American students also followed the trend, with scores dropping one point from 246 in 2003 to 245 in 2005.
Score gaps continue
“When considering these results, it’s also important to look at the gap between the scores of groups of students,” said Dr. Rick Melmer, secretary of the South Dakota Department of Education. “Certainly we’re pleased with the improved scores of our Native American students, but we’ve got to continue to close the gap between their scores and those of the general student population.”
Another “gap” area that deserves attention is the difference between the scores of students eligible for the free lunch program and those not eligible for the program. Participation in the free and reduced lunch program is an indicator of poverty. In 2005, the gaps between these two groups in both subjects and both grade levels range from 15 to 20 points.
“The link between poverty and achievement is not a new issue,” Melmer said. “These students need and deserve the attention necessary to bring them up to higher levels of achievement.”
For more information related to NAEP, visit http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard.
-30-